Nexstar, the FCC, and Jimmy Kimmel: When Corporate Silence Looks Like Censorship
Published on September 18, 2025
How did a late-night quip turn into people shouting “First Amendment”? A corporation pulling a show is usually that corporation’s own speech. The leap from programming choice to constitutional problem isn’t obvious—so let’s unpack it.
Background: Why Nexstar Matters Now
Nexstar Media is in the middle of a massive deal: acquiring Tegna for six point two billion dollars. This adds dozens of stations and widens the gap with the next-largest owner. To close, Nexstar needs FCC approval: national ownership caps, local duopoly rules, and the broad public interest standard all apply. Missteps here can jeopardize the deal or trigger scrutiny.
For context on how business concentration and incentives shape politics, see our opinion piece Capitalism as Emergent Math.
source: Reuters
Timeline
- First: Kimmel comments on the aftermath of the Charlie Kirk assassination.
- Then: FCC’s Brendan Carr publicly criticizes and urges affiliates to reconsider carriage.
- Next: Nexstar calls the remarks “offensive and insensitive,” stops airing JKL on its ABC stations “for the foreseeable future.” There’s no definitive proof they acted solely because of Carr’s comments, but it’s not a stretch to see the incentive structure.
- Finally: ABC/Disney suspends the show indefinitely rather than clash with its largest affiliate group.
FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez warns that content-based license threats would be unconstitutional and outside the FCC’s authority.
source: Reuters
The Big Question
Ordinarily, when a broadcaster pulls content, it’s simply an editorial choice and would normally be constitutionally protected free speech in itself. But when regulators hint at consequences, and the country’s largest station owner happens to be seeking FCC approval, “voluntary” decisions begin to look less like independence and more like pressure-driven self-censorship.
Why This Could Signal Something Bigger
- Normalizing pressure during mergers could train broadcasters to self-censor to stay in the “regulatory safe zone.”
- It hints at ideological litmus tests—despite courts rejecting content-based bans.
- If the Tegna deal sails through after this, critics will call it ineptitude—or something worse.
These dynamics echo the broader pattern we explored in When Markets Fail, Strongmen Rise: economic consolidation and political pressure feeding each other in ways that erode democratic safeguards.
source: Reuters
Where This Leaves Us
Next time someone dismisses this as mere entertainment drama, ask: why did Nexstar pull the plug, why did ABC comply, and why now—while Nexstar’s FCC standing is still pending?
Because this might be less about one comedian’s “insensitive” joke and more about what free speech looks like when you rUn ThE cOuNtRy LiKe A bUsInEsS.
Expect Nexstar to sit at the center of more reporting soon. And while that unfolds, keep pressing for those Epstein files.