Trump Declares Hatred a Political Virtue
Published on September 23, 2025
Memorials are meant for mourning, reflection, and honoring the dead. But when Donald Trump took the stage at Charlie Kirk’s memorial, he twisted that solemn moment into a performance of grievance and hatred.
A memorial turned political stage
Attendees gathered expecting to remember Kirk — a man celebrated by his movement for his discipline and sharp messaging. Instead, they were treated to Trump’s familiar refrain: a story not about the deceased, but about himself. Trump praised Kirk for not hating his opponents and for “wanting the best for them.” And then, in a whiplash moment, Trump boasted of the very opposite: that he hates his opponents.
Source: New York Times
Why it matters
Hatred is not just a personal quirk when spoken by a political leader. It is a governing philosophy, a signal to followers that cruelty is not only acceptable but admirable. To declare this during a memorial — a setting that should transcend partisan score-settling — is to corrode the cultural fabric that binds us in moments of grief.
Source: The Atlantic
Weaponizing grief
Trump’s pivot at Kirk’s memorial illustrates how even death becomes raw material for his political theater. Rather than channeling loss into unity, he used the platform to model division: to show that hatred is the defining line between him and the “weakness” of his allies. It was less an elegy for Kirk than a rehearsal for the next campaign rally.
Source: When Markets Fail, Strongmen Rise
The cost of normalizing hate
Democracies survive on pluralism: the belief that opponents are still citizens, neighbors, and fellow humans. When a former president stands at a memorial and insists hatred is his strength, he is not just confessing a personal failing. He is urging a movement to abandon pluralism altogether.
Source: Capitalism as Emergent Math
Conclusion
A memorial should remind us of our shared mortality and our shared humanity. Trump turned it into the opposite: a showcase of division, a call to despise rather than to mourn together. In that choice, he revealed not strength but corrosion — a politics where even death is bent into hatred’s service.